Time Warp (Continued from page 1)


If her premise is valid, there should be a direct connection between poverty rates and the rate of births to unmarried women. As the non-marital birth rate increases, so should the poverty rate.  This has not happened! Over the past 40 years, there has been a slow but steady increase in the birth rate of unmarried women across all demographic categories.  During this same period, poverty rates have varied due to shifts in the economy and labor market, availability of jobs, adequacy of wages and government benefits, and the cost of basic necessities, with no direct relationship to the non-marital birthrate (see graph).  Moreover, Mac Donald never acknowledges that never-married mothers and their children account for less than 20% of all poor people and for only 30% of all poor families (Census Bureau Report, Poverty in the United States: 1997).

Claim #2.  "...the right-to-have-a-baby-school, which holds that regardless of the economic and emotional stability of the parents, a woman has a right to have a baby at the government's expense. This question turns on only her rights, not the baby's fate."   Heather Mac Donald, "The Real Welfare Problem is Illegitimacy," City Journal, Winter 1998

"City health workers should be required to discuss adoption as the most loving alternative for the child."

Heather Mac Donald, "The Real Welfare Problem is Illegitimacy,"
City Journal, Winter 1998


Mac Donald suggests that childrearing is a privilege and not a right, and that privilege should only be reserved for those most "fit."  She believes all poor unmarried mothers are not "fit" parents by virtue of their economic and marital status.

Mac Donald's solution to protecting children from their "unfit" mothers is to pressure these mothers into putting their children up for adoption.  What would be the result of government-mandated adoption counseling and the reduction in support services?  Mass orphanages to house and raise all children born to unmarried women?  Perhaps coerced abortion or forced sterilization?

Mac Donald calls for a "Big Brother" approach to family life.  She advocates for government to separate children from their parents instead of providing financial support for poor children and their families.

Claim #3  "To be blunt, rather than easing the way for single mothers, the city should restore the burden of having a child out of wedlock.  Only in the last three decades did society facilitate illegitimacy, with predictable results."      Heather Mac Donald, "The Real Wel


fare Problem Is Illegitimacy," City Journal, Winter 1998

Mac Donald's remedy for single parenting is a heavy dose of stigma and a big reduction in  services.  She professes that providing services to families with unmarried parents hurts children by sending the wrong messages to their parents.  She concludes that reducing services will reduce "immoral" behavior.

Following her rationale, areas with high levels of support services should have high levels of non-marital births; states with the most generous welfare grants would have the highest non-marital birthrates and low benefit states would have lower non-marital birth rates. Yet, two states with similar non-marital birthrates in 1996, Hawaii (30.3%) and Texas (30.4%), have grossly different benefit levels.  The maximum monthly cash grant for a household of three in Texas is $188.  In comparison, Hawaii's grant level is $712.


Thanks for your ideas, Heather, but it seems like poverty is a bit more complex than family composition.


*Mimi Abramovitz, Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare 
Policy from Colonial Times to the Present (Revised Edition)
, 1996

2
Continue